![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
At the moment, I cannot figure when an immediate response would
be needed. I think Phil mentions that somewhere else as well. The idea
would be to arm trickle and let it time out. Also let us keep in mind that in networking at large, most
timers are jittered to avoid network synchronizations. In wireless, it is even
worse since as you point out, synchronization also means collisions. Pascal From:
roll-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien
Abeille (jabeille) Hi
all, one
question: when
a router receives a DIS, should it answer right away? I guess this is a good
source of collision, so a random timer would help. Could we set T to a random
value between I_min /2 and I_Min, without resetting I (receiving a DIS
does not mean inconsistency)? Best, Julien |