Re: [Roll] Closing on Ticket #10
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Roll] Closing on Ticket #10



>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Winter <wintert at acm.org> writes:
    Tim> My opinion is for Option 1.  I think that the applicability
    Tim> statements are the right place to start pinning down
    Tim> interoperability w.r.t. OFs - as appropriate to each
    Tim> application space.  This may also include interoperability
    Tim> between application spaces.

I'm fine with that. The applicability statements will be the main anchor
into the standard, that's fine.   My concern is that it appeared that
some wanted to leave to do other industry "fora" to declare.  As long as
there is an IETF standards track document that says what is what, then
I'm happy.

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.