Re: [Roll] Closing on Ticket #10

[JP Vasseur <jvasseur at cisco.com>]

On Nov 14, 2009, at 4:08 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:

> > > > > > "Tim" == Tim Winter <wintert at acm.org> writes:
>    Tim> My opinion is for Option 1.  I think that the applicability
>    Tim> statements are the right place to start pinning down
>    Tim> interoperability w.r.t. OFs - as appropriate to each
>    Tim> application space.  This may also include interoperability
>    Tim> between application spaces.
>
> I'm fine with that. The applicability statements will be the main  
> anchor
> into the standard, that's fine.   My concern is that it appeared that
> some wanted to leave to do other industry "fora" to declare.  As  
> long as
> there is an IETF standards track document that says what is what, then
> I'm happy.

Excellent. Issue resolved. Just note that applicability statements are  
part of our charter
and will be informational.

Thanks.

JP.

> --
> ]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |   
> firewalls  [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net  
> architect[
> ] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ | 
> device driver[
>   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE 
> >
> 	               then sign the petition.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll