Re: [Roll] need clarification: DIS processing
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Roll] need clarification: DIS processing



On Nov 16, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


"Jerald" == Jerald P Martocci <Jerald.P.Martocci at jci.com> writes:
   Jerald> I agree with Julien that we need a DIO solicitation message
   Jerald> (i.e. DIS) since as he says a packet can't wait around for
   Jerald> hours waiting for a new DAG parent.  I buy that and agree
   Jerald> with it.  However, I am a bit confused why a multicast DIS
   Jerald> should trigger a multicast DIO.  This seems to simply add
   Jerald> unnecessary packets onto the network.

 I am reacting to the last sentence.
 I'd have thought that multicast avoids unncesary packets!!!!
 So perhaps we are not talking about the same thing?

 Maybe we need better terminology.
 I think that there are three kinds of transmission:
   a) unicast
   b) link-level multicast
   c) subnet-level multicast
 On ethernet, (b) and (c) are the same thing.


Just bear in mind that we always refer to IP multicast, since we are not link layer specific.

 On 6lowpan-type networks, I think (b) is what happens when you
transmit to the nodes that can hear you, and (c) is what you do via a
whiteboard or multicast relay.

 (Maybe there are accepted terms for this, of which I am ignorant)

 Only transmissions of type (c) cause more packets on the wire.

 Transmissions of type (b) would save packets, because one message
arrives at many receivers at the same time. Maybe (b) causes receivers
that would otherwise have been happy to sleep (doze?) to wake up.

- --
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ | device driver[ Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE >
	               then sign the petition.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQEVAwUBSwGs6YCLcPvd0N1lAQKt/QgAoaq8+YxFPjcDwbZMyl5lfHHpvr+khEdH
LgGd+8AmdNNfeiINH/369a02FgMuAZQjb1SHGdGsZZcR0JcB5BajalaAJy3VD0yL
IwfUxGwlaHZrcmJaBkQ5ShHOH4tUizo/9hLar4vEtFu4EGLUaRR5C86VMTdtLs1s
eUXiDLXhaftjyVhDC8TsYOY92FGdw/cmy8LFXNgCSBVqPgUwOV5t4oo5lngvzhQp
U5Znba6IvrHmMb4w8m8UIkuKZ1ugaBBQG9/S2a5EAAw+6vBK1x6aHVnxpdQXS5qG
VnCoxQlYIS5aBY/zPl+/siB8srLkEpKUHlTquVH8Ee0QgncNgdftqg==
=MCIA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.