[Roll] Trickle clarification: (in)consistency

To: <roll at ietf.org>
Subject: [Roll] Trickle clarification: (in)consistency
From: "Julien Abeille (jabeille)" <jabeille at cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:57:47 +0100
Authentication-results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Delivered-to: roll at core3.amsl.com
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcppKKhboIjg0YjmSzmUkYKmlGQKnw==
Thread-topic: Trickle clarification: (in)consistency

Hi all,

- when the DAG is considered inconsistent, I think we do not double I when I fires. Correct?

- when do we increment C?

- most importantly: how does a node know it is in consistent mode?

Best,

Julien

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Roll] Trickle clarification: (in)consistency
  - From: Philip Levis