![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Nov 18, 2009, at 10:59 AM, Roger K. Alexander wrote:
Hi Pascal, See link to a public reference as appearing in 'RFC Express' (a verydifferent RFC). The article provides references to the cited patents (thetexts of which can be found on the web). http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuit-news.asp?id=3461Since we do not practice any form of source routing we continue to contest the allegation, though it is believed others may have settled. Based on whatwe have seen, this type of litigation is an emerging part of the AMI industry.
Bummer. Since contesting infringement can be easier than validity and settlement can be attractive, the patent remains.
Phil