Re: [rrg] Point of order

Xiaoliang Zhao <xleonzhao@gmail.com> Wed, 15 April 2009 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <xleonzhao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F30B3A6C2E for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ho5hMTK3reOK for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7B53A697A for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so2068513anc.37 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=THg4WD0ReqzDmgQs8EVMBF8r+/8NoPhAfWOlAQ+ao5g=; b=QUVzKrK8U9B8/Het0yd2zDiponSrblJZUnm+9zjQeEzV31NCK1G04S/8OslEBTE4H7 u/SycKMlY9rkoSni4EJ0rnoTr6dWt39wfFbe0gTV7O/8EBuLbb0U72YGOlkRZxZy1bWm lw2sJ5KcXhgYqmU6Gwgj1wd+ypwI8BF5HRV9c=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PVrbFIBkEGqOnq7+1Qc/yP1WgyYpLH1TjzRvRRG51252pCZhfz5cxlf5unJqPwiEfA e7OKU4lgViOif9xVUr28bO8hL2ajoFICTZkuA243OCfhCp/w6neP/uV+iBy2YiGBqh9G qRm7VAq+yLZHi0fE+vEFwRdyR+g46MzassPmo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.45.9 with SMTP id s9mr492023ans.133.1239807318395; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <49E595F1.1080703@firstpr.com.au>
References: <49DD6DD2.3060105@tony.li> <49E555A3.80502@tony.li> <3c3e3fca0904142151y3ed1d026jb0d27f122eeef1ff@mail.gmail.com> <49E595F1.1080703@firstpr.com.au>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:55:17 -0400
Message-ID: <4e913c5d0904150755s337be9f8t90b42e66d84daf3d@mail.gmail.com>
From: Xiaoliang Zhao <xleonzhao@gmail.com>
To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] Point of order
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:54:07 -0000

> It is a problem whose solutions are tightly bound by the need for
> compatibility with all existing hosts and most existing routers - and
> by the need to ensure immediate benefits for early adopters, since
> the solution will only work if it is voluntarily adopted by most
> end-user networks which want multihoming, portability etc.
>
I would consensus on this one.

Best,
----
Xiaoliang (Leon) Zhao
Sr. Network Engineer
Public IP Global Network Engineering
Verizon Business