[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [rrg] Anycast in the core architecture

From: Robin Whittle <rw at firstpr.com.au>
To: rrg at irtf.org
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:00:49 +1000
In-reply-to: <3c3e3fca0904221028kfa93629q924cdd369e41791b at mail.gmail.com>
References: <ccc.4fb8f167.371fa1e3 at aol.com> <3c3e3fca0904221028kfa93629q924cdd369e41791b at mail.gmail.com>

Hi Bill,

I will respond to what you wrote to me in the "Anycast in the core
architecture - sep. OK; elim not?" thread and what you wrote about
"Disaster Recovery" in a separate thread.

  - Robin

References:
- Re: [rrg] Anycast in the core architecture
  - From: HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Anycast in the core architecture
  - From: William Herrin

Prev by Date: Re: [rrg] Anycast in the core architecture
Next by Date: Re: [rrg] Anycast in the core architecture - sep. OK; elim not?
Previous by thread: Re: [rrg] Anycast in the core architecture
Next by thread: Re: [rrg] Anycast in the core architecture
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.