Yes. That was the point of my comment at the mike in the session.I like some of the soltuions that do host based handling, in part because they allow for things like multipath TCP.
But, if we are going to do that, we are going to have to actually make renumbering a LOT easier. We are going to have to address the issues in Brian Carpenter's draft. I believe that some of the issues will themselves be made easier by the separation of identifiers from locators. But it will take more work than that.
Yours, Joel Michael Menth wrote: ...
We also discovered that issue. Probably we can say, it's hard to combine the following three things:1. Multihoming 2. Active multipath routing by the host3. Local addresses hiding information about global locators which makes renumbering easier.Regards, MichaelNoel _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg at irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.