On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Dae Young KIM <dykim at cnu.kr> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Lloyd Wood <L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> On 18 Nov 2009, at 17:57, Dae Young KIM wrote: >> > Actually, I'm new to this group, so don't have the collected knowledge >> > of >> > past conversations. My sincere apology. >> >> The mailing list archive's at: >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/current/maillist.html >> 2008 and before are at: >> http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/rrg/ > > Thank you. >> >> L. >> >> DTN work: http://info.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/saratoga/ >> >> <http://info.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk> > > Yet, I think I can still defend my definition of the term. but redefining doesn't help the conversation that's been ongoing here for .... 3+ yrs. ID == host attachment point Locator == network (or loosely ASN in today's bgp4 routed world) -chris > -- > Regards, > > DY > http://cnu.kr/~dykim >
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.