Re: [rrg] MIP in a future routing architecture

[HeinerHummel at aol.com]

In einer eMail vom 26.11.2009 02:28:51 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt scott.brim at gmail.com:

Lixia pointed out that mobility is a fundamental requirement but not a
fundamental component.  For any proposal RRG have come up with, there
are at least several ways to support mobility.  RRG's focus is rightly
on routing and addressing architecture.  There is reason for confidence
that whatever we nail down for routing and addressing, we can build
mobility on top of it.

Scott,

Yes, of course. But how to do the adjustment ! We used to joke: Koflach, the ski boot being that hard, that every foot will adjust to it. I think the other way around would be more convenient.

 

Why not design the routing architecture such that you don't need a home agent or care-of-address server !

And, in particular situations, that you might find your destination although you have only a vague idea about its current location ?!!!

 

Heiner