[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [rrg] Ivip Critique

From: Tony Li <tony.li at tony.li>
To: Lixia Zhang <lixia at cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: rrg at irtf.org
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:28:43 -0800
In-reply-to: <44ACD6A1-FD12-4310-A881-EA46BA71B215 at cs.ucla.edu>
References: <44ACD6A1-FD12-4310-A881-EA46BA71B215 at cs.ucla.edu>

Lixia Zhang wrote:

Robin and I have had a few rounds of text revisions. Since the deadlineis fast approaching, here is my latest version.



Received and incorporated.

I noted that there was no comment on the MTU issue.  Should there be?

Tony

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rrg] Ivip Critique
  - From: Robin Whittle

References:
- [rrg] Ivip Critique
  - From: Lixia Zhang

Prev by Date: Re: [rrg] Analysis/Critique of Name-Based Sockets (revision 2)
Next by Date: Re: [rrg] a quick critique on 2-phased mapping
Previous by thread: Re: [rrg] Ivip Critique
Next by thread: Re: [rrg] Ivip Critique
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.