IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 04 October 2011 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A6121F8BC4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 08:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.091, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qbfxg1bfFfvO for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 08:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2F321F8B8E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 08:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxt33 with SMTP id 33so774238yxt.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7Slh+UGEDqWTFIM0ODXesp0JzgyOJ+zd7rM9ygnxtug=; b=r3WtpHGmGgTyW9R+TYO1vKXoHA+y6H+v5q47vB90HwWXwTWvsMNIgswLrCRc/nAYIQ tE9iUDKIReRpWOzF1/T6scaVmz/QNWCxaJD3BeSUw9ZLfJ7m4Gi7krJQlQTYB0B5XSnL C10Zbv2i3CfGoBtXtV3uhdOZH9Nw3ejVkOB5w=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.187.35 with SMTP id x23mr7982420yhm.6.1317744086265; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.105.169 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 09:01:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBi9BzDu=WOq3RG-o5nbfnUTftDg3LRBU3DFh=Kc4W5ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf303dd5062ab0cb04ae7b3400"
Subject: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:58:22 -0000

At today's Chairs call, Cullen, Magnus and I had a discussion of how to make
progress on the signaling discussion.  We feel the mailing list discussion
needs to have more concrete proposals in order to make progress, and so
we're putting forward the following:

1) If you plan to put forward a draft proposing a concrete solution in this
space, please send your name to the mailing list with that intent by October
7th *THIS FRIDAY*.

2) Please have a -00 draft out for discussion by October 14th (the following
Friday).  This is to allow for a discussion and update prior to the -01
deadlines.

3) We will hold a conference call to discuss the drafts on October 21st (the
Friday after that).

Updates based on that discussion then have until the -01 drafts deadline to
be complete.

This is aggressive, but we feel we need to have at least -00s for the
different ideas in place in order to make real progress.

thanks,

Ted, Magnus, Cullen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email