[rtcweb] MTI codec discussion, request to postpone
Serge Lachapelle <sergel@webrtc.org> Thu, 08 November 2012 13:55 UTC
Return-Path: <sergel@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C76121F85C7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 05:55:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CcEc1D9aBnI9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 05:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7913121F85BA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 05:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 9so4694589iec.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=H6WYgdmolYsXpcA6vz9IUOgsmA9/AVrYPkjNRxNkmn8=; b=RFhZM12rMl4A3Rdopvg7kj8fDtwJM5OdLzhA1z3g9qp/vBCVJhrM681D5JryAp6jeU 4T1ck1W9917aWRhE7lkIqIPgKWPtztGK/+uY3ZbrV2sNXQN2hvkVHjL4/1T0eKgAa90m deiIrshe8SoI1rl/76Smdy6Me89arAg0zsJa2CEI7trXUuRhAC9MvTpLKHZmc5ABGQts lufLVqA8fErr78P/GWA7UFu6Vm7xgUKyBztLAW5rQ1wvr0TkR9UsxtbwcAmDnhuZl72F 2ND4xDTCaXuzgqc5SCKe0+c8rbXIUSJV5mA3PaobfiTA724pz1Ck65fqo1+IatoXobqr ca3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=H6WYgdmolYsXpcA6vz9IUOgsmA9/AVrYPkjNRxNkmn8=; b=hiAvM5NIk8d7uani1lCeLwar4X69rstxX3PiIvdibUGbVrBmKR/3V893o+CMepAUrp zvpB/k9zhhSDS8jxiTzh0pVPiLDc9kgr3nCDL8/GeC5bUSphnAzKTh44y2w8BgxTunKv 0ryuuihXhvP4S7POpTEELFKGAHYZG17x+bwKqAT2dmTrB4DUxj9lXZpZQLVZ+Cvuz2Fz 7qSxZtLF4I//IfYyWSh3mb77fKTYjNqullujWRWeMRSPU1WAbk2DqlGGOxK/dhfsjt3V AlSCAT0k3GMmI+baJRPOjRysDAT6+GO5wDVw0AYQuageaLwdashq9BAQjOXVPMTaKk9Z tazQ==
Received: by 10.50.46.134 with SMTP id v6mr8116424igm.55.1352382950810; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: sergel@google.com
Received: by 10.231.46.135 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 05:55:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Serge Lachapelle <sergel@webrtc.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:55:20 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: a53VjFBs7X6I3-sUy3_dVgPGvGw
Message-ID: <CAMKM2LwgoK4yXxys8vXDH-rnWdKOhBtpwCu28GZMudTdJRt1Pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae9340f536222e204cdfc3104"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8ZpRj6lHhRYJNc9gFnE7SBEc6g81u0qAwCTdfiiIpNzw2HGqX4KwAG/V8udUY/zDWiyW5g+PnSIJU48UwogNDqKmHdB5q7FwhyTcDsbwYI4KiIq7eWSzLSk4pa286Fv/m2kE9XoTOKBdsJorXeUfajaKAQxdVYqQl0WcfNX+yU+3H1LsKXH+lOgvy4qJZWpSUxM/N
Subject: [rtcweb] MTI codec discussion, request to postpone
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:55:52 -0000
All, Google understands that concerns have been raised within the IETF RTCWEB WG in regards to VP8 IPR. We endeavored to properly address these concerns in time for this IETF meeting but did not meet the deadline. We hereby commit to addressing this by the next IETF meeting in Orlando. Our proposal will address prevalent IPR issues. Google believes strongly that the VP8 codec is the best technical option for a mandatory to implement codec. We therefore kindly ask to postpone this decision and hope the workgoup will take this opportunity to make progress on other vital topics. /Serge
- [rtcweb] MTI codec discussion, request to postpone Serge Lachapelle
- Re: [rtcweb] MTI codec discussion, request to pos… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] MTI codec discussion, request to pos… David Singer