Re: [rtcweb] MTI codec discussion, request to postpone
David Singer <singer@apple.com> Thu, 08 November 2012 16:14 UTC
Return-Path: <singer@apple.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F3621F88EF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 08:14:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lVYwEaNOFz-Q for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 08:14:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBF121F87E5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 08:14:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_EMTP4CvcGDAPO4fcN8AObw)"
Received: from relay17.apple.com ([17.128.113.18]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MD600KXYFNPDF81@mail-out.apple.com> for rtcweb@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:14:27 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11807112-b7f296d000001183-41-509bda62b63f
Received: from chicory.apple.com (chicory.apple.com [17.128.115.99]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (RC4-MD5/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay17.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 67.98.04483.26ADB905; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:14:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [17.78.213.51] by chicory.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0MD6009DFFRYWU10@chicory.apple.com> for rtcweb@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:14:26 -0800 (PST)
From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <CAMKM2LwgoK4yXxys8vXDH-rnWdKOhBtpwCu28GZMudTdJRt1Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:14:24 +0100
Message-id: <F0AF214E-ED6A-4959-94EF-4F9E58F17D53@apple.com>
References: <CAMKM2LwgoK4yXxys8vXDH-rnWdKOhBtpwCu28GZMudTdJRt1Pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Serge Lachapelle <sergel@webrtc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FCcrJt8a3aAwcx/jBZr/7WzOzB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEro/PqZfaC/foVna8eMTYw/tHoYuTgkBAwkdhxSLqLkRPIFJO4 cG89WxcjF4eQwBQmie/tK5ggnEYmiYPPXrCDVDELJEl87DnFCtLMK6AnMWl/EEhYWMBe4tr8 o2wgNpuAqsSDOccYQWxOgWCJlq+XmEBsFqB4/7zfzBBjhCW+P77HAmLzCthIXN3fAhYXEgiQ mPtwK1hcREBD4vZtiHoJAVmJFVN7mSYw8s9CcsUshCsgwtoSyxa+Zoaw9SReNr1jxxTXlbi4 bhLjAka2VYyCRak5iZWG5nqJBQU5qXrJ+bmbGMFhWii0g/H+Lr1DjAIcjEo8vEIsswOEWBPL iitzDzFKcDArifAGHQUK8aYkVlalFuXHF5XmpBYfYpTmYFES532wZWaAkEB6YklqdmpqQWoR TJaJg1OqgbGvo+6at00T37GyDtH9R7zF573SEjC/9MeS3eVXkAPX38XHTPzZ7x3cVmX7bcr0 M1dVmN/O2FhSdet2aejdK1r/VrZtUGxfHnplb5988b4dkVWbQjY02h2LcXy7ZbH9hJv2u7sd lN+GMFWfXPbt7aXgCzcn3l3/SqGqcdbqzduCs8S89lRd/LZbiaU4I9FQi7moOBEAypmrQ08C AAA=
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] MTI codec discussion, request to postpone
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:14:47 -0000
On Nov 8, 2012, at 14:55 , Serge Lachapelle <sergel@webrtc.org> wrote: > All, > > Google understands that concerns have been raised within the IETF RTCWEB WG in regards to VP8 IPR. We endeavored to properly address these concerns in time for this IETF meeting but did not meet the deadline. whoa, whoa. this has been on the agenda for quite a long time, and other people have gone to quite some trouble to prepare for and attend the meeting. > We hereby commit to addressing this by the next IETF meeting in Orlando. Our proposal will address prevalent IPR issues. > > Google believes strongly that the VP8 codec is the best technical option for a mandatory to implement codec. The best *technical* option is almost certainly something widely deployed, implemented, and understood. :-) > We therefore kindly ask to postpone this decision and hope the workgoup will take this opportunity to make progress on other vital topics. Perhaps a courtesy delay is appropriate, perhaps not, but asking so late is not good. Even 24 hours notice would have been courteous. This not a 'VP8 project', VP8 stands as a possible candidate, one of a set. It seems you are having trouble putting it formally on the table. Are you sure that those troubles can be resolved in a defined interval? David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
- [rtcweb] MTI codec discussion, request to postpone Serge Lachapelle
- Re: [rtcweb] MTI codec discussion, request to pos… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] MTI codec discussion, request to pos… David Singer