[rtcweb] Draft Agenda RTCWeb IETF89 - Version 1
"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1751A0306 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:44:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T5KasLq1Ldv7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:44:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2B71A02B7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:44:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1453; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1392309890; x=1393519490; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=MELq/qM2AtqYys8BLhaApqC4fPrR6kEgzysQ9j+R/Yc=; b=lX+2A14qM308S/vDY1fZfA4TmEvc3oulFGIy8u356kKvsdA+8JJ3eloX /f4yUZ5P8HOYvWmrbCThefBH7iB93MhCDilyrNdHUD3r1QvTdhoorNREW cEQvhcdQW3MWnahjJ7XjCAaUToGgB2+1lTN7+1Iyiimz4cLATEPEbPBIf w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjwFAA72/FKtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABZgwaBD79MgRgWdIIseRIBBnonBA6ICol4viYXjnmDK4EUAQOYLJIjgy2CKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,839,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="303831689"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 16:44:49 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1DGinxI011999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:44:49 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.180]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:44:49 -0600
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Draft Agenda RTCWeb IETF89 - Version 1
Thread-Index: AQHPKNroA1BbAkEL7UmC4afRmUQA4g==
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:44:49 +0000
Message-ID: <96FF5D3E-ECF0-47C4-B26F-CA7CFD41D61F@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <F59B3383460F234A89D593FE14B0333F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [rtcweb] Draft Agenda RTCWeb IETF89 - Version 1
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:44:52 -0000
Here is very rough draft of what we currently have on the agenda. Note that the first hour of wed conflicts with some transport stuff. Thanks, the chairs ———————————————— Draft Agenda Version 1 Tuesday 9 -11:30 Chair Admin: (chairs) - 10 min Data Channel: (who ???) - 80 min draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol <Need Open Issues Here> Transports - Harald - 45 min draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports - The appropriate form of the reference to draft-dhesikan - MUST support ALTERNATE-SERVER - MUST, SHOULD or MAY on TURN TCP candidates - MUST, SHOULD or MAY on ICE TCP candidates - Whether this draft should have normative references on anything SDP-related (which, conceptually, are above the transport level). Stun/DTLS heartbeat discussion: Dan Wing - 15 min draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness Wed 9-11:30 Chair Admin: (chairs) - 5 min JSEP: Justin - 90 min draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep Update from RMCAT - RMCAT Chairs - 10 min Sec / Sec Arch: Eric Rescorla - 30 min draft-ietf-rtcweb-security draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch RTP usage: Colin -15 min draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage - Prepared for WG Last Call - Issues with latest changes? NAT-Firewall: Still trying to resolve what parts of this are in this WG - Andy ( ?? minutes) draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-03
- [rtcweb] Draft Agenda RTCWeb IETF89 - Version 1 Cullen Jennings (fluffy)