[rtcweb] DTLS version
Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Mon, 30 June 2014 23:44 UTC
Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FAA1A0402 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.802
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fgh8holILkTB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFFC01B27AC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.181] (p508F0C46.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.143.12.70]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F50E1C0B4026 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 01:44:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A963F527-57EB-4617-9583-6C0D63DDE4BD@lurchi.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 01:44:42 +0200
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Us5fMHbDfo8b8uaMWHWIFiL8Jxg
Subject: [rtcweb] DTLS version
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 23:44:48 -0000
Dear all, based on a comment from EKR, I would like to bring up a question: RTCWeb uses DTLS for deriving the keys for SRTP on the one hand and for transporting SCTP on the other hand. The SRTP related documents refer to DTLS version 1.0 as specified in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4347 The SCTP over DTLS document currently refers to DTLS version 1.2 as specified in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6347 I think we need to use a single version of DTLS for RTCWeb. RFC 4347 is obsoleted by RFC 6347. Wouldn't that imply that it makes sense to use DTLS 1.2 in all documents? Best regards Michael
- [rtcweb] DTLS version Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Jim Spring
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Shijun Sun
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version Shijun Sun