Re: BFD For MPLS LSPs

[Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf at gmail.com>]

Hi Authors,

I had another comment. I guess you can clarify that the BFD on the LSP
ping Initiator should be started in Passive role while on the
terminator it should be in the Active Role.

   "A system taking the Active role MUST send BFD
   Control packets for a particular session, regardless of whether it
   has received any BFD packets for that session.  A system taking the
   Passive role MUST NOT begin sending BFD packets for a particular
   session until it has received a BFD packet for that session, and thus
   has learned the remote system's discriminator value."

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Vishwas Manral<vishwas.ietf at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi authors,
>
> I noticed you have wrongly used the address "0:0:0:0:0:FFFF:7F00/104"
> which is not a valid IPv6 address. Can you use the addresse as defined
> in the draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-bfd-07?
>
> It has been agreed upon when we had a discussion between Carlos, Brian
> Carpenter and I (for the other drafts that use the same wrong
> address).
>
> Thanks,
> Vishwas
>