Re: The usage of "Concatenation" in BFD spec.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The usage of "Concatenation" in BFD spec.
As has been pointed out to me privately, the terminology has been
completely messed up by the definition of "virtual concatenation",
which is a parallel bundle of pipes over which a "concatenated" pipe
is reverse-muxed. This effectively destroys the usefulness of the
term. Perhaps we can get the folks at Lake Superior State to add it
to this year's list of banned words. ;-)
--Dave
On Oct 2, 2009, at 1:43 PM, David Ward wrote:
Linda -
So far, you are the first to ask :-)
Nonetheless, the functionality is about to be deprecated for PWE as
that WG is going to use status signaling and not BFD. The PWE WG was
the origination of "concatenated path" (where the request for the
diag came from) so, unfort we couldn't change without a lengthy
interaction/exchange with that WG.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.