Re: The usage of "Concatenation" in BFD spec.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The usage of "Concatenation" in BFD spec.

To: Linda Dunbar <ldunbar at huawei.com>
Subject: Re: The usage of "Concatenation" in BFD spec.
From: Dave Katz <dkatz at juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:16:19 -0600
Cc: rtg-bfd at ietf.org, dward at cisco.com
Delivered-to: rtg-bfd at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <008d01ca43a2$fb5a4300$330c7c0a at china.huawei.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd>
List-help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <006601ca3c6b$cab7a280$330c7c0a at china.huawei.com> <2CBD2C94-3383-4BD0-9D30-2D5F9216F194 at juniper.net> <004f01ca4397$7489c8b0$330c7c0a at china.huawei.com> <67FB774C-5419-4958-BDC1-8D5B127A6207 at juniper.net> <008d01ca43a2$fb5a4300$330c7c0a at china.huawei.com>

I've already done so...

--Dave

On Oct 2, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote:

It would be very helpful to add a parenthetical insertion that disambiguates it

Linda

References:
- How to enforce BFD to be sent over different paths between two systems?
  - From: Linda Dunbar
- Re: How to enforce BFD to be sent over different paths between two systems?
  - From: Dave Katz
- The usage of "Concatenation" in BFD spec.
  - From: Linda Dunbar

Prev by Date: Re: The usage of "Concatenation" in BFD spec.
Next by Date: RE: More questions on "draft-ietf-bfd-base-09.txt"
Previous by thread: Re: The usage of "Concatenation" in BFD spec.
Next by thread: RE: More questions on "draft-ietf-bfd-base-09.txt"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.