the dubious P in L1VPN Was: (Re: [L1vpn] Proposed charter for L1VPN WG)

[Loa Andersson <loa at pi.se>]

Dimitri,

the reason I called it "dubious" is that the service seems be
more appropriate for Public operators (Virtual Public Networks),
than for "private" use.

Note: Hold comments along the line "There might be private entrprises
tht want to..." I realize that, what I'm talking about is where we
have an immediate need, and I mostly see bw-broker type of operators
on the L1VPN market.

But you are right the "dubious p" applies to GMPLS VPN also.

/Loa

Dimitri.Papadimitriou at alcatel.be wrote:
< snip >
> note: you mention the "P" for private is bit dubious and so preferrable 
> to make use GMPLS VPN but is this name not also including the dubious "P" ?


--
Loa Andersson

Principal Networking Architect
Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson at acreo.se
                                           loa at pi.se