In message <015a01c57a75$4e1e7b70$6801a8c0 at stephen>
"Stephen Sprunk" writes:
That seems excessively restrictive. There are many environments
today using jumbo frames (8k-10k MTU) on end hosts without
problems.
This also begs for a definition of what exactly a "jumbo" frame is;
does an MPLS label (or several) on the front of a 1500-byte Ethernet
frame count? Does a packet on media with a >1500 byte native
MTU count? Should a host on FDDI or a direct HDLC/PPP link be
limited to 1500 byte packets -- even though its native MTU is 4470
-- because we fear it might need to talk to an Ethernet-connected
host?
Jumbo frames specificly refers to ethernet. FDDI, HIPPI, HDLC, PPP,
etc are not affected. It was these interfaces at end systems with
100baseT, GbE, and 10GbE in provider POPs that created the
requirement for ethernet jumbo frames.