Re: Three Documents to Review

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian at olddog.co.uk>]

Hi all,

1. Reviewers of the two ccamp docs: have a care to compare and contrast the 
Abstracts before launching into either review.

2. I can look at the Manet draft. I have no experience of that field, but 
some experience of message jitter from the RSVP world.

Cheers,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ross Callon" <rcallon at juniper.net>
To: <rtg-dir at ietf.org>
Cc: "Ross Callon" <rcallon at juniper.net>; "David Ward" <dward at cisco.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 4:28 PM
Subject: Three Documents to Review


I would appreciate it if volunteers could help to review the following
drafts

(most likely one per reviewer, although the first two are related). I
would

like to put all on the IESG agenda for two weeks from this Thursday.



 Framework for MPLS-TE to GMPLS migration

 draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-fmwk-04.txt



 Interworking Requirements to Support operation of MPLS-TE over GMPLS
Networks
 draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt



 Jitter considerations in MANETs
 draft-ietf-manet-jitter-02.txt



Thanks, Ross