[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IESG agenda for 2007-11-29 telechat.
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2007-11-29).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
TSV Session Traversal Utilities for (NAT) (STUN)
(Proposed Standard) - 1 of 9
draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-13.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
RAI Revised Civic Location Format for PIDF-LO
(Proposed Standard) - 2 of 9
draft-ietf-geopriv-revised-civic-lo-06.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Robert is proto shepherd
Token: Cullen Jennings
Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) Staircase and
TSV Triangle Forward Error Correction (FEC)
Schemes (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 9
draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-ldpc-07.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
TSV Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction (FEC)
Schemes (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 9
draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-rs-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
Using the Boneh-Franklin and Boneh-Boyen
SEC Oct 15 identity-based encryption algorithms with the
Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) (Proposed
Standard) - 5 of 9
draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-08.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
SEC Oct 15 Identity-based Encryption Architecture
(Proposed Standard) - 6 of 9
draft-ietf-smime-ibearch-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
RAI A More Loss-Tolerant RTP Payload Format for
MP3 Audio (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 9
draft-ietf-avt-rfc3119bis-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Colin Perkins is the document shepherd.
Token: Cullen Jennings
Definition of Events For Channel-Oriented
RAI Telephony Signalling (Proposed Standard) - 8
of 9
draft-ietf-avt-rfc2833biscas-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Proto shepherd is Roni Even
Token: Cullen Jennings
INT Mobile IPv4 Traversal Across IPsec-based VPN
Gateways (BCP) - 9 of 9
draft-ietf-mip4-vpn-problem-solution-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Henrik Levkowetz
Token: Jari Arkko
2.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
INT Secure Connectivity and Mobility using Mobile
IPv4 and MOBIKE (BCP) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-mip4-mobike-connectivity-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is
<pete.mccann at motorola.com>
Token: Jari Arkko
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
Area Date
APP ASCII Escaping of Unicode Characters
(BCP) - 1 of 1
draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-07.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Chris Newman
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
Area Date
RTG Jitter considerations in Mobile Ad Hoc
Networks (MANETs) (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-manet-jitter-03.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
Area Date
INT Service Selection for Mobile IPv6
(Informational) - 1 of 2
draft-korhonen-mip6-service-05.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Note: No document shepherd
Token: Jari Arkko
INT Unified L2 Abstractions for L3-Driven Fast
Handover (Experimental) - 2 of 2
draft-irtf-mobopts-l2-abstractions-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: This is an IRTF submission
Token: Jari Arkko
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot
positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments
will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
document.
3.3.1 New Item
Area Date
Reorder Density and Reorder Buffer-occupancy
GEN Density - Metrics for Packet Reordering
Measurements (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-jayasumana-reorder-density-08.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Note: Suggest to respond to the RFC Editor with
RFC 3932, Section 3, Option 2: "The IESG thinks
that this work is related to IETF work done in
the IPPM WG, but this does not prevent
publishing."
Token: Lars Eggert
3.3.2 Returning Item
Area Date
TSV Metrics for the Evaluation of Congestion
Control Mechanisms (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-irtf-tmrg-metrics-11.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: To be published according to
draft-irtf-rfcs-01.txt Based on the Working
Group Summary, I believe that the
second variant suggested in Appendix A of
draft-irtf-rfcs-0
is appropriate for this document: "This
document in not an IETF Internet Standard. It
represents
the individual opinion(s) of one or more
members of the TMRG
Research Group of the Internet Research Task
Force. It may be
considered for standardization by the IETF or
adoption as a
IRTF Research Group consensus document in the
future."
Token: Lars Eggert
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
6.1 Approval of IESG Policy on Autoresponse Messages Sent to IETF
Mailing Lists (Chris Newman)
7. Working Group News