[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IESG agenda for 2008-01-24 telechat.
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2008-01-24).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
Better-Than-Nothing-Security: An
SEC Unauthenticated Mode of IPsec (Proposed
Standard) - 1 of 4
draft-ietf-btns-core-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: The proto shepherd is Julien Laganier
Token: Sam Hartman
SEC The EAP TLS Authentication Protocol
(Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4
draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-13.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Joe Salowey is the proto shepherd
Token: Sam Hartman
RTG Generalized MANET Packet/Message Format
(Proposed Standard) - 3 of 4
draft-ietf-manet-packetbb-11.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
RTG Representing multi-value time in MANETs
(Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4
draft-ietf-manet-timetlv-04.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
2.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
Failure Detection and Locator Pair
INT Exploration Protocol for IPv6 Multihoming
(Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-09.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Please also read
draft-ietf-shim6-applicability
Mark is handling this for Jari as he is an
author
Token: Mark Townsley
INT Shim6: Level 3 Multihoming Shim Protocol for
IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
draft-ietf-shim6-proto-09.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Please also read
draft-ietf-shim6-applicability
Document Shepherd is Geoff Huston
<gih at apnic.net>
Token: Jari Arkko
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
Area Date
APP The IMAP ENABLE Extension (Proposed
Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-gulbrandsen-imap-enable-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Alexey Melnikov is the document
shepherd
Token: Chris Newman
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
Area Date
OPS IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in 802.16 Networks
(Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-v6ops-802-16-deployment-scenarios-06.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
Area Date
A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for
APP the European Broadcasting Union (EBU)
(Informational) - 1 of 2
draft-evain-ebu-urn-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lisa Dusseault
Session Description Protocol (SDP) Attributes
RAI for OMA BCAST Service and Content Protection
(Informational) - 2 of 2
draft-dondeti-oma-mmusic-sdp-attrs-00.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Cullen Jennings
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot
positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments
will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
document.
3.3.1 New Item
Area Date
Considerations of provider-to-provider
GEN agreements for Internet-scale QoS
(Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-levis-provider-qos-agreement-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
APP Dec 26 vCard and CardDAV (vcarddav) - 1 of 2
Token: Chris
RTG Dec 20 Routing Over Low power and Lossy
networks (roll) - 2 of 2
Token: David
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
6.1 Appeal (Russ Housley)
6.2 RFC Errata (Russ Housley)
6.3 Guidance to WG Chairs regarding off-topic mail list posting (Russ
Housley)
6.4 Executive Session for IAOC Candidate Selection (Russ Housley)
7. Working Group News