Re: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate review- draft-ietf-sidr-cps
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 01 July 2014 17:07 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C2A1B2875 for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.646
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JOy9UM8vHb0p for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125911B2881 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.124.192.236;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sidr-cps@tools.ietf.org
References: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C80CB79562@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
In-Reply-To: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C80CB79562@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:07:34 -0400
Message-ID: <007801cf954e$f459d770$dd0d8650$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0079_01CF952D.6D4B92D0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHBgUmHYHShme0nYIe8MTweC4lI4punmELQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/_rdE_DZbrI_iD-SyTrSBWvQ4kDk
Cc: 'Jonathan Hardwick' <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, adrian@olddog.co.uk, draft-ietf-sidr-cps@tools.ietf.org, db3546@att.com, ''Alia Atlas'' <akatlas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate review- draft-ietf-sidr-cps
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:07:39 -0000
Stephen, Derrick, Karen: This is a routing directorate review which as three parts: a) status, b) technical review, and c) editorial review. Status: Ready for publication Technical Review: This Certification form covers all necessary items for a CPS who is part of RPKI. Editorial review: This document is well-written and readable for any network administrator or Security administrator. Tiny nit: p. 16, 3.2.2 second paragraph Old: Certificate that is used, accurately reflects New: Certificate this is used accurately reflects. Definitions nit: p. 26 OCSP and SCVP. Here, it may be nice to spell out OCSP And SCVP. I believe you mean: OCSP (Online Certificate Status Protocol), SCVP (Server-Based Certificate Validation Protocol). If these are incorrect expansions of OCSP and SCVP, you really need to put in expansions of the abbreviations. Sue Hares From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A [mailto:db3546@att.com] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 5:09 PM To: shares@ndzh.com Cc: Jonathan Hardwick (Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com); 'Alia Atlas' (akatlas@gmail.com); adrian@olddog.co.uk Subject: Routing Directorate review- draft-ietf-sidr-cps Hi Sue, Can you do this review by July 1st? Thanks, Deborah
- Re: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate review- draft-i… Susan Hares
- Re: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate review- draft-i… Stephen Kent
- Re: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate review- draft-i… Susan Hares