IETF Logo Mail Archive

[RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases-06.txt

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 23 January 2015 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935B01A8858; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:09:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v_cOQNQj-IM0; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:09:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ED111A87BE; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08661BC717E; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:09:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (pool-70-106-134-12.clppva.east.verizon.net [70.106.134.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14A351BC7164; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54C2B86A.6010607@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:08:58 -0500
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/7f9MZ52VWEroTQlMpv8kiXR2XM4>
Cc: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases@tools.ietf.org, "<rtgwg@ietf.org>" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases-06.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:09:59 -0000

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. 
The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related 
drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and 
sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide 
assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing 
Directorate, please see ​ 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it 
would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF 
Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through 
discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases-06.txt
     Advanced Multipath Use Cases and Design Considerations
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 23-January-2015
IETF LC End Date: N/A
Intended Status: Informational

Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Minor note: This draft appears to have expired.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email