[RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization

Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Sat, 16 April 2016 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <gih@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8215E12D602 for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.787
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.787 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=apnic.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsCTyK9f4HTk for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nx-mailgw.apnic.net (nx-mailgw.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dd8:9:801::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A001712B023 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=R2D2; h=received:received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer:return-path; bh=/LkNkQOoj7qLfiJhVEDTEPalv+6IfL4l3RdPw7FMZew=; b=O8B/v6SnGihn50dXeBdFLyWH8acesISNfLFgDW5AQwHHFfUawHWkODcpwlQeZQqfoK48lcb1F5FEp rNSsXJZUKWvEtRjYmUd4cC4h9GX9ZaMVGZ3ewXhehO43pkt3IFse7D3z26lyNTpJ5DPpuLgDqhCulB qai3lqK6KOhvNjQc=
Received: from NXMDA2.org.apnic.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:dd8:9:2::101:249]) by nx-mailgw.apnic.net (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPS; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:46:58 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from dhcp150.potaroo.net (203.119.101.249) by NXMDA2.org.apnic.net (203.119.107.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:43:47 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <C636AF2FA540124E9B9ACB5A6BECCE6B7DEA372D@SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:44:11 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <85F5A4D0-AE6B-4B5A-B888-0F0FF9859991@apnic.net>
References: <C636AF2FA540124E9B9ACB5A6BECCE6B7DEA372D@SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
To: rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/-l9pDUBB1-hzqpJFXMmWXCA1zwA>
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization@tools.ietg.org, rtg-dir@ietf.org, trill@ietf.org
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 01:44:22 -0000

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization-05.txt
Reviewer: Geoff Huston
Review Date: 16 April 2016
IETF LC End Date: date-if-known 
Intended Status: copy-from-I-D

Summary: 
	This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be considered prior to publication.

Comments:
	I found the draft concise and clear. It was readable and readily understood.

Major Issues:
	No major issues found


Minor Issues:
	No minor issues found.

Nits:
	Minor:
	 section 2: “...receive and save such mapping information also.” seems a bit stilted  and I would say “also receive and save such mapping information.

         section 3.1 "populate the information of sender's IP/MAC in its ARP table”. Do the authors really mean "ARP table" if the information was learned by ND? i.e. its clear that the authors are referring to the local IP/MAC address table, but the previous text tends to associated ARP with IPv4 and ND with IPv6. Perhaps “AARP/ND table” ?