[RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate Review of draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-08
"Russ White" <7riw77@gmail.com> Fri, 27 May 2016 14:45 UTC
Return-Path: <7riw77@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B88A12D53E; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F40Tcswif64I; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com (mail-yw0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A2D12D551; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id c127so107842647ywb.1; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=TqR7XI3TXY0zHrCLp264L15fq7o+PVJJyzU0hFoVdGE=; b=buM8sK/qn8SDAfik0BdYaGxYbNC9Ro0ZizrftJjpSnW4MmSnLhzzulrZswXrAJA3/B p0JcuQLcPQ5Q62owKxpzEqFK96hnMnRtaFxjmiJv82Edh8qn/2hR2Xja1JtTtsmFZylD pYstmXXNodluwu5nDlgPN2IdABKtB6jFXccFrtAr1AQ1c9z5ibyT+8tkB7OMJ/f2fmjL NfWLmeb7Psaa/Vf0Ym2SqEHMSxUWMXAeoDmU8aW6xJUqsypqcQC/z/ipTAqq8/Xyq4bY ST6OcWwyk/4Rtp0zJg+ra6146eywq+/uo7qR/J4yqRiCzYRmHLKFb65odOLIYaeL3hsR 46UQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=TqR7XI3TXY0zHrCLp264L15fq7o+PVJJyzU0hFoVdGE=; b=H9FCr7gOu9S0zbcchXi7I124B43uAJESfcyY4Lva02R48RNAtniGqmQaOHhttXtlXl cKKwikTIeYAbewN4ssfTtJbgjAVVMwEqiojdMwQdPIWlucIoBsDSJA/vLqIARubuOPrT zw/V+TnUUXKmmuUYp0bqF7SZBbb772Lt7pbFJQH+kgYycSos+cb89vnL1dkb+QLHgVbu fDESjPYdp5OXisP4wpsIq8Jh7ma/yIkf0vs5uoxCFD+Guh7K5jXHt2AAlWPEKb3J/3sN JgTNbZOa56G8xoQBou+oXpGM96JQ9jjUOLoBwT4bEqzqKAR91F4BcsyNXKKSoTn6XzBa acwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKFU31qoLQvQc/qvHGY/VcxJ80q5Nx1YNm5EwL5s/2Ee418h0lcMDSIKND8As7Ftg==
X-Received: by 10.13.216.147 with SMTP id a141mr8487810ywe.313.1464360351001; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Russ (162-229-180-77.lightspeed.rlghnc.sbcglobal.net. [162.229.180.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i125sm5524989ywc.26.2016.05.27.07.45.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 May 2016 07:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Russ White <7riw77@gmail.com>
To: rtg-ads@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:45:49 -0400
Message-ID: <03f101d1b826$7624b440$626e1cc0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdG4JXeaPgztMzHRRfyJyq7nsiiK3g==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/kIuwuYQhY3RS1e3n0tdw2xh-H3M>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf.all@ietf.org
Subject: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate Review of draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-08
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:45:53 -0000
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-08 Reviewer: Russ White Review Date: 27 May 2016 IETF LC End Date: 23 May 2016 Intended Status: Informational Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Comments: This is a very useful draft for informational state. Overall, the draft is well written, the diagrams are helpful, and the references look correct. Major Issues: None found Minor Issues: None found Nits: It is important to understand the background of how DHCP works when considering those diagrams. Those/these The relay agent that receives client’s message sets giaddr field to the address... Either remove "field" after giaddr or add "the" before giaddr I found one or two more really minor nits, but didn't write them down, and now can't find them again. Generally, though, the quality of this document is very high, and all nits are very minor. :-) Russ
- [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate Review of draft-iet… Russ White
- Re: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate Review of draft… Tomek Mrugalski