RE: Agenda topics for IETF-72

["Thomas, Matthew R" <mrthom at essex.ac.uk>]

Hi Dimitri,
 
I can answer some of the questions;
 
[...] IS-IS could be more approriate. The code is likely to be on the AQ boxes anyway.
-> I think that it should be. Routing is routing after all I guess.
 
 
Matthew
 
1. No plans at present to work on lite. Referencing it allowed us flexibility in what we wanted to do. for lite read 'link state protocol'.
2. D Farinacci suggested a best practise document but this lost interest on the lists. Radia and me worked on Pseudonode reduction. I referenced unpublished mathematics at 71 in IS-IS. For completion this can now be found here:  http://dces.essex.ac.uk/staff/hunter/Thomas%20CommsLett%202008.pdf
 

________________________________

From: rtgwg-bounces at ietf.org on behalf of PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
Sent: Wed 11/06/2008 22:58
To: Yousuf, Mohammad A; John G. Scudder; ZININ Alex; akatlas at gmail.com
Cc: rtgwg at ietf.org
Subject: RE: Agenda topics for IETF-72



hi

i would like to understand the following point:

"This draft uses MAC Address Translation (MAT) to provide VLAN
functionality natively to BB (Backbone Bridging). Pair wise shortest
paths are calculated for each of the unique C-MACs (one per Chrysolite
switch)."

[...] "Ospf-lite [LITE] will be used as the link state routing protocol
to calculate the pair-wise shortest paths."

-> is RTGWG also dealing with non-network layer routing aspects (even if
link state can be obviously applied at other layers, SPB currently
developed at IEEE being a good example) ?

btw, is OSPF-LITE going to be re-discussed and re-visited per feedback
provided in VC/IETF 70, as i don't see any updated referenced in this
doc.

thanks,
-d.


 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtgwg-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-bounces at ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of Yousuf, Mohammad A
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:19 PM
> To: John G. Scudder; ZININ Alex; akatlas at gmail.com
> Cc: rtgwg at ietf.org
> Subject: FW: Agenda topics for IETF-72
>
> Thanks John,
>
>
> Can we book a slot at Dublin.
> draft-yousuf-thomas-hunter-rtgwg-bb-01.txt. 10 minutes should be
> sufficient
>
> Regards,
>
> Mohammad Yousuf
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtgwg-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of John G. Scudder
> Sent: 09 June 2008 16:50
> To: rtgwg at ietf.org
> Cc: ZININ Alex
> Subject: Agenda topics for IETF-72
>
> Folks,
>
> If you'd like an agenda slot for our IETF-72 meeting, please send 
> email to the chairs.  Please also let us know how much time
> you think 
> you'll need.
>
> Even if you requested a slot for IETF-71 and got deferred, please do 
> send a reminder.
>
> --John
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg


_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg