[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [saag] Fwd: draft-bonica-tcp-auth

From: Eric Rescorla <ekr at rtfm.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>
Cc: saag at mit.edu
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:29:20 -0700
In-reply-to: <7.0.0.16.2.20060420095609.06191b18 at vigilsec.com> (Russ Housley's message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:57:55 -0400")
References: <7.0.0.16.2.20060420095609.06191b18 at vigilsec.com>

Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> writes:
> We had a presentation at the IETF 65 SAAG session about this 
> document.  What should we say to the TCPM folks?

I don't have any opinion about what SAAG should say, but as 
I mentioned in the meeting (and later on in IM with Sam),
I have serious concerns about this approach. So, I'll take this
as a prod to write them up.

-Ekr

References:
- [saag] Fwd: draft-bonica-tcp-auth
  - From: Russ Housley

Prev by Date: [saag] Fwd: draft-bonica-tcp-auth
Next by Date: Re: [saag] Fwd: draft-bonica-tcp-auth
Previous by thread: [saag] Fwd: draft-bonica-tcp-auth
Next by thread: Re: [saag] Fwd: draft-bonica-tcp-auth
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.