[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [saag] IPsec spec problems



>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Kent <kent at bbn.com> writes:

    Stephen> At 8:26 AM -0400 4/28/06, Sam Hartman wrote: ...  Sam,

    Stephen> I think your characterization is a good one, and I have a
    Stephen> guess as to why application protocol developers are
    Stephen> finding that they have to work hard to use IPsec in their
    Stephen> environments.

    Stephen> The IPsec WG, like most others, refined its documents
    Stephen> based on feedback from list members.  Most of these list
    Stephen> members represented VPN vendors, but there were also host
    Stephen> vendors represented.  However, there were no OSPF folks
    Stephen> involved, nor BGP folks (other than my interest in using
    Stephen> IPsec to protect BGP). So it is not surprising that
    Stephen> details related to other applications were not as well
    Stephen> represented.

Absolutely.  But we cannot always get all parties involved.  So we
work on incremental improvement.



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.