> I appreciate your exploration of the option relative to your > in-depth knowledge of Cisco implementations, but I hope > you'll understand if I suggest that a broader evaluation of > what is and is not viable is what is needed when we consider > options for IETF standards. I'm all for more empirical work in this area - as long as IETF "standards" work keep on the path of _working_ code. And from the operator's view point, operationally deployable code. This conversation started around questions on draft-bonica-tcp-auth. You have vendors and operators documenting what have found to be operationally deployable code that will meet their needs. There is a question of what SAAG "should we say to the TCPM folks." What's next?
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.