[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[saag] Request for review of an upcoming NIST document on firewalls



Greetings. I have excerpted a recent NIST request for comments on a pending document below. I am the co-author of the document, and we really do want suggestions from the firewall side of the security community on the document.

NIST SP 800 documents are long-lived and are relied on by a very large audience, particularly by people throughout the US government. Improvements that can be made to this draft now will help people buying and administering firewalls for many years.

If you would, please take the time to read the draft. If you find anything, large or small, please send comments to the NIST address listed. (Sending comments to me is not a good idea because I can't just make changes at this stage; they should go through the NIST review process.) Every comment will be read and many will have direct effects on the content of the final document.

Also, please pass this along to anyone in your organization who might have time to review the document. Thanks in advance!

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

3. Draft SP 800-41 Revision 1, Guidelines on Firewalls and Firewall Policy, provides recommendations on developing firewall policies and on selecting, configuring, testing, deploying, and managing firewalls. The publication covers a number of firewall technologies, including packet filtering, stateful inspection, application-proxy gateways, host-based, and personal firewalls. SP 800-41 Revision 1 updates the original publication, which was released in 2002. NIST requests comments on draft SP 800-41 Revision 1 by August 15, 2008. Please submit comments to 800-41comments at nist.gov with "Comments SP 800-41" in the subject line.

URL: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsDrafts.html#800-41-Rev1
_______________________________________________
saag mailing list
saag at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.