On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 12:15 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:32:44 -0700 > Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at sun.com> wrote: > > It is IMHO not necessary to specify what a label-unaware system should > > do with a labeled packet -- if they get one at all, it's a serious > > error on the part of the sender. > > > Actually, 793 disagrees: > > The security paramaters may be used even in a non-secure environment > (the values would indicate unclassified data), thus hosts in > non-secure environments must be prepared to receive the security > parameters, though they need not send them. > > The question is how realistic that statement is. As you probably would have guessed, I think it's entirely unrealistic. - Bill _______________________________________________ saag mailing list saag at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.