[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [saag] Call for Participation: IETF 73 MAC Labeling Bar BOF



 hi, Dave,
I am not clear about the prospective topics of the bar bof. Can you point me
to the 3 draft you mentioned?
Thanks

Sean

>-----Original Message-----
>From: saag-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:saag-bounces at ietf.org] On 
>Behalf Of David P. Quigley
>Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 6:06 AM
>To: paul.moore at hp.com; latten at austin.ibm.com; 
>Kurt.Zeilenga at Isode.com; saag at ietf.org; 
>rja at extremenetworks.com; Nicolas.Williams at sun.com; Jarrett.Lu at sun.com
>Subject: [saag] Call for Participation: IETF 73 MAC Labeling Bar BOF
>
>Hello, 
>
>I am organizing a Bar BOF to discuss the use of security 
>labels in IETF protocols. Recently there have been at least 
>three drafts introduced to the IETF which deal with security 
>labels. While there may be other drafts in the work that deal 
>with this topic, from the three I've seen there is at least 
>one issue where myself and others believe we need to reach a 
>consensus. 
>
>According to the IETF 73 cutoff dates list we won't know the 
>final agenda for the event until October 27th. Once this date 
>rolls around I will post a list of suggested dates and times 
>for the BOF to take place. I also need to figure out where in 
>the hotel to host the BOF. As the name suggests we can hold it 
>in the hotel's bar, however another suggestion has been to get 
>a room at a restaurant and hold the meeting over dinner. 
>Depending on the interest in this BOF neither of these options 
>may accommodate the number of people interested. In that case 
>I'll have to see if I can find a more suitable place to hold the BOF.
>Hopefully I will have this information to you before we arrive 
>at IETF 73 but if I don't I'll make sure I inform everyone of 
>where I will post the information.
>
>As of right now I have four people interested in the BOF and I 
>hope to have more as time passes. I would like to be able to 
>create a mailing list for the BOF but unfortunately I am not 
>able to do that where I am. If someone else would like to host 
>the mailing list (Not to be taken as a solicitation by the US
>Govt) that would be great. For now if you are interested in 
>the BOF feel free to email me so I have an idea of the general 
>interest.
>
>The current agenda only has one item on it and that is the 
>specification of a DOI. In the recent weeks I've read three 
>drafts that have three different specifications of Domains of 
>Interpretation (DOIs). While this is the only thing I have at 
>the moment if you have other suggestions for topics or drafts 
>you would like to discuss please bring them to my attention so 
>I can make sure to add them to the agenda.
>
>Dave Quigley
>
>_______________________________________________
>saag mailing list
>saag at ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
>


_______________________________________________
saag mailing list
saag at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.