hi, Dave, I am not clear about the prospective topics of the bar bof. Can you point me to the 3 draft you mentioned? Thanks Sean >-----Original Message----- >From: saag-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:saag-bounces at ietf.org] On >Behalf Of David P. Quigley >Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 6:06 AM >To: paul.moore at hp.com; latten at austin.ibm.com; >Kurt.Zeilenga at Isode.com; saag at ietf.org; >rja at extremenetworks.com; Nicolas.Williams at sun.com; Jarrett.Lu at sun.com >Subject: [saag] Call for Participation: IETF 73 MAC Labeling Bar BOF > >Hello, > >I am organizing a Bar BOF to discuss the use of security >labels in IETF protocols. Recently there have been at least >three drafts introduced to the IETF which deal with security >labels. While there may be other drafts in the work that deal >with this topic, from the three I've seen there is at least >one issue where myself and others believe we need to reach a >consensus. > >According to the IETF 73 cutoff dates list we won't know the >final agenda for the event until October 27th. Once this date >rolls around I will post a list of suggested dates and times >for the BOF to take place. I also need to figure out where in >the hotel to host the BOF. As the name suggests we can hold it >in the hotel's bar, however another suggestion has been to get >a room at a restaurant and hold the meeting over dinner. >Depending on the interest in this BOF neither of these options >may accommodate the number of people interested. In that case >I'll have to see if I can find a more suitable place to hold the BOF. >Hopefully I will have this information to you before we arrive >at IETF 73 but if I don't I'll make sure I inform everyone of >where I will post the information. > >As of right now I have four people interested in the BOF and I >hope to have more as time passes. I would like to be able to >create a mailing list for the BOF but unfortunately I am not >able to do that where I am. If someone else would like to host >the mailing list (Not to be taken as a solicitation by the US >Govt) that would be great. For now if you are interested in >the BOF feel free to email me so I have an idea of the general >interest. > >The current agenda only has one item on it and that is the >specification of a DOI. In the recent weeks I've read three >drafts that have three different specifications of Domains of >Interpretation (DOIs). While this is the only thing I have at >the moment if you have other suggestions for topics or drafts >you would like to discuss please bring them to my attention so >I can make sure to add them to the agenda. > >Dave Quigley > >_______________________________________________ >saag mailing list >saag at ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag > _______________________________________________ saag mailing list saag at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.