On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:40:18 -0400 Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at sun.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 14:54 -0700, Joe Touch wrote: > > I.e., if this is really a virtual network, there's a LOT of work > > left to be done. > > All that behavioral description work is entirely independent of the > label encoding draft, and there is IMHO no rational reason to delay > publication of draft-stjohns-sipso-* (and the allocation of relelvant > codepoints by IANA) in order to document minutiae of behavior which > are better spelled out in separate drafts documenting the interaction > of MLS labeling and specific protocols. > I disagree -- I think there have been enough points raised on the clarity of the threat model and some behavioral points that I think more discussion is indicated. Apart from that, it does prescribe behavior at variance with the TCP standard. (As I noted, I think this document is more correct, but it nevertheless contradicts 793.) --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ saag mailing list saag at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.