[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [saag] Common labeled security (comment on CALIPSO, labeled NFSv4)



Nico,

The link provided by Sean should help you quite a bit.

The main module leaves up to you to define the semantics of categories
and their interactions.  (May be this is consistent with what Russ is
saying about categories adding excessive complexity)

I did not look at other modules to see if they define categories any
further. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Turner [mailto:turners at ieca.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 9:28 PM
> To: Nicolas Williams
> Cc: Santosh Chokhani; labeled-nfs at linux-nfs.org; 
> selinux at tycho.nsa.gov; saag at ietf.org; 
> nfs-discuss at opensolaris.org; nfsv4 at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [saag] Common labeled security (comment on 
> CALIPSO, labeled NFSv4)
> 
> Nico,
> 
> I usually try to find the corresponding ITU spec because I 
> think ITU gives out all of it's ASN.1 modules freely?  
> Anyway, here's a link to the ITU-T X.841 Spec:
> http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/asn1/database/itu-t/x/x841/2000/index.html
> 
> The one thing that's missing from the module is definitions 
> for security categories.  Some suggested categories were 
> defined in Annex B, but it's an informative annex so there's 
> no ASN.1 freely available (they wouldn't allow them in the 
> normative text/module).  Those categories are based on FIPS 
> 188 (the syntax is not the same).
> 
> Note that some of the syntax for labels has made it's way to 
> some IDs/RFCs notably RFC 2634.
> 
> spt
> 
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 03:51:46PM -0400, Santosh Chokhani wrote:
> >> NSA document on SPIF also had ASN.1 module for SPIF.
> > 
> > Ah, good!  A link would be great.
> > 
> >> May be you can use the applicable concepts to get a head 
> start on XML. 
> > 
> > If the ASN.1 module can be obtained freely then the XML follows 
> > trivially (and, as I said, has already been done).
> > _______________________________________________
> > saag mailing list
> > saag at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
> > 
> 

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.