[saag] Important open-source activities...

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sat, 20 December 2014 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495541A8871 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:24:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2dJTIjNtx-Aa for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:24:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD8D1A8F4A for <saag@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:24:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01015BF13 for <saag@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 02:24:14 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ECBK43Tym4sx for <saag@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 02:24:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.12] (unknown [86.42.21.41]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA318BEBF for <saag@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 02:24:13 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <5494DDCD.6030504@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 02:24:13 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/_iBX7Lr16ldMyzqYXWUHQe9Iij8
Subject: [saag] Important open-source activities...
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 02:24:22 -0000

Hiya,

The IESG have recently been discussing how the IETF would
work better with or for open-source communities. As part of
that it'd be good to get some appreciation of which open
source activities folks consider important (and why). And
of course there are multiple directions here - e.g. where an
IETF activity has fed directly into an open-source activity
and the opposite where the IETF end up documenting something
already done by some open-source community.

As part of that analysis, an utterly reasonable question
was asked: yeah, but which open-source things are important
to IETF participants?

So, which bits of open-source do we in the security area
of the IETF consider important and why? And what could
we do better? (For any sensible definition of "we":-)

BTW, those are deliberately open questions - answer in any
way you like, (but pithily please:-) to the list or to
Kathleen and I off-list if need be. (If we see a bunch of
offlist answers, we'll summarise those back to the list.)

And since this is really information-gathering, there's
no need for us to disagree with one another on the list
(but I expect we won't resist that specific temptation, as
usual:-)

Thanks,
S.