Re: [saag] Important open-source activities...

Folks,

I'll try summarise this thread in a week or so, so please
continue to chime in in the meantime.

(And to make my life easier when summarising, I've attached
a mail from another list that I think is relevant too.)

Cheers,
S.

On 20/12/14 02:24, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> The IESG have recently been discussing how the IETF would
> work better with or for open-source communities. As part of
> that it'd be good to get some appreciation of which open
> source activities folks consider important (and why). And
> of course there are multiple directions here - e.g. where an
> IETF activity has fed directly into an open-source activity
> and the opposite where the IETF end up documenting something
> already done by some open-source community.
> 
> As part of that analysis, an utterly reasonable question
> was asked: yeah, but which open-source things are important
> to IETF participants?
> 
> So, which bits of open-source do we in the security area
> of the IETF consider important and why? And what could
> we do better? (For any sensible definition of "we":-)
> 
> BTW, those are deliberately open questions - answer in any
> way you like, (but pithily please:-) to the list or to
> Kathleen and I off-list if need be. (If we see a bunch of
> offlist answers, we'll summarise those back to the list.)
> 
> And since this is really information-gathering, there's
> no need for us to disagree with one another on the list
> (but I expect we won't resist that specific temptation, as
> usual:-)
> 
> Thanks,
> S.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list
> saag@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
> 
> 