[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sasl] Status of draft-ietf-sasl-digest-to-historic and draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-to-historic

From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
Cc: sasl at ietf.org
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:14:03 +0900
In-reply-to: <4AF970CA.4000807 at isode.com>
References: <4AF970CA.4000807 at isode.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/10/09 10:55 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> It looks like now is a good time to initiate WGLC on these 2 drafts
> (after they refreshed, of course). Opinions?

Agreed. Presumably they would be advanced together with
draft-ietf-sasl-scram?

/psa

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkr515sACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxlPgCgkLgx7PE3JoRah2XKn9Pbu3pj
eFQAnRJEI0kc44cZcfmduKwxxxi3Q5BC
=ZgMw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sasl] Status of draft-ietf-sasl-digest-to-historic and draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-to-historic
  - From: Alexey Melnikov

References:
- [sasl] Status of draft-ietf-sasl-digest-to-historic and draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-to-historic
  - From: Alexey Melnikov

Prev by Date: Re: [sasl] Draft StringPrep/SASLPrep slides
Next by Date: Re: [sasl] Status of draft-ietf-sasl-digest-to-historic and draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-to-historic
Previous by thread: [sasl] Status of draft-ietf-sasl-digest-to-historic and draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-to-historic
Next by thread: Re: [sasl] Status of draft-ietf-sasl-digest-to-historic and draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-to-historic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.