[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sasl] Status of draft-ietf-sasl-digest-to-historic and draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-to-historic

From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>
Cc: sasl at ietf.org
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:07:32 +0900
In-reply-to: <4AF9D79B.6050403 at stpeter.im>
References: <4AF970CA.4000807 at isode.com> <4AF9D79B.6050403 at stpeter.im>

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

On 11/10/09 10:55 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

It looks like now is a good time to initiate WGLC on these 2 drafts
(after they refreshed, of course). Opinions?

Agreed. Presumably they would be advanced together with
draft-ietf-sasl-scram?

draft-ietf-sasl-scram is already done (in RFC Editor queue). SCRAM wasblocking them, at least that was an earlier agreement in the WG.

References:
- [sasl] Status of draft-ietf-sasl-digest-to-historic and draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-to-historic
  - From: Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [sasl] Status of draft-ietf-sasl-digest-to-historic and draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-to-historic
  - From: Peter Saint-Andre

Prev by Date: Re: [sasl] Status of draft-ietf-sasl-digest-to-historic and draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-to-historic
Next by Date: Re: [sasl] Draft StringPrep/SASLPrep slides
Previous by thread: Re: [sasl] Status of draft-ietf-sasl-digest-to-historic and draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-to-historic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.