On Oct 31, 2008, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
The reason I am saying that approach (1) is "opt-in" is this: Beforethe attack, the SAVI device does not even perform any validation at all.what do you mean? AFAIU, the SAVI device by default drops all thepackets except those coming with a source address containing one of theon-link prefixes.
So a SAVI device by default drops all packets from off-link prefixes? But the validation of these packets is exactly what we want to leave to ingress filtering, right? Then, since we leave to ingress filtering the validation of packets with off-link prefixes, the SAVI device should let these packets pass IMO. - Christian
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.