[savi] Working Group Adoption of Individual SAVI Documents

[Christian Vogt <christian.vogt at ericsson.com>]

Dear all -

At the previous SAVI meeting in Minneapolis, we did a vote regarding
which individual documents to use as starting points for the SAVI
working group deliverables.  I would now like to confirm this decision
from Minneapolis here on the mailing list.

The result of the vote in Minneapolis was thus:

- To adopt draft-mcpherson-savi-threat-scope as a starting point for the
  Threats Analysis (Problem Statement) document:  7 in favour, 0
  against.

- To adopt draft-vogt-savi-rationale as a starting point for the
  Rationale document:  7 in favour, 0 against.

- To adopt draft-bagnulo-savi-fcfs as a starting point for both the IPv4
  and IPv6 Solution documents:  11 in favour, 2 against.

- To adopt draft-bagnulo-savi-send as a starting point for the
  SeND-based IPv6 Solution document:  8 in favour, 1 against.

Arguments raised by those voting against the adoption of one of the
individual documents above related to potential security vulnerabilities
or potential issues with mobile hosts.  Both arguments would need to be
addressed as the working group deliverables are being advanced.

Please express on this mailing list whether or not you agree with the
above documents being adopted by the SAVI working group as starting
points for the various working group deliverables.  Please also state
the reasons in case you are against one of the documents being adopted.

- Christian