Hi, It appears some of these drafts have expired. Can the drafts be re-published so people can look at them before making a decision? I suggest you extend the review period accordingly. David Harrington dbharrington at comcast.net ietfdbh at comcast.net dharrington at huawei.com > -----Original Message----- > From: savi-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:savi-bounces at ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Christian Vogt > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:15 AM > To: SAVI Mailing List > Subject: [savi] Working Group Adoption of Individual SAVI Documents > > Dear all - > > At the previous SAVI meeting in Minneapolis, we did a vote regarding > which individual documents to use as starting points for the SAVI > working group deliverables. I would now like to confirm this decision > from Minneapolis here on the mailing list. > > The result of the vote in Minneapolis was thus: > > - To adopt draft-mcpherson-savi-threat-scope as a starting > point for the > Threats Analysis (Problem Statement) document: 7 in favour, 0 > against. > > - To adopt draft-vogt-savi-rationale as a starting point for the > Rationale document: 7 in favour, 0 against. > > - To adopt draft-bagnulo-savi-fcfs as a starting point for > both the IPv4 > and IPv6 Solution documents: 11 in favour, 2 against. > > - To adopt draft-bagnulo-savi-send as a starting point for the > SeND-based IPv6 Solution document: 8 in favour, 1 against. > > Arguments raised by those voting against the adoption of one of the > individual documents above related to potential security > vulnerabilities > or potential issues with mobile hosts. Both arguments would > need to be > addressed as the working group deliverables are being advanced. > > Please express on this mailing list whether or not you agree with the > above documents being adopted by the SAVI working group as starting > points for the various working group deliverables. Please also state > the reasons in case you are against one of the documents > being adopted. > > - Christian > > > _______________________________________________ > savi mailing list > savi at ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi >
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.