[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [savi] Working Group Adoption of Individual SAVI Documents



Hi,

It appears some of these drafts have expired.
Can the drafts be re-published so people can look at them before
making a decision?
I suggest you extend the review period accordingly.

David Harrington
dbharrington at comcast.net
ietfdbh at comcast.net
dharrington at huawei.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: savi-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:savi-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Christian Vogt
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:15 AM
> To: SAVI Mailing List
> Subject: [savi] Working Group Adoption of Individual SAVI Documents
> 
> Dear all -
> 
> At the previous SAVI meeting in Minneapolis, we did a vote regarding
> which individual documents to use as starting points for the SAVI
> working group deliverables.  I would now like to confirm this
decision
> from Minneapolis here on the mailing list.
> 
> The result of the vote in Minneapolis was thus:
> 
> - To adopt draft-mcpherson-savi-threat-scope as a starting 
> point for the
>    Threats Analysis (Problem Statement) document:  7 in favour, 0
>    against.
> 
> - To adopt draft-vogt-savi-rationale as a starting point for the
>    Rationale document:  7 in favour, 0 against.
> 
> - To adopt draft-bagnulo-savi-fcfs as a starting point for 
> both the IPv4
>    and IPv6 Solution documents:  11 in favour, 2 against.
> 
> - To adopt draft-bagnulo-savi-send as a starting point for the
>    SeND-based IPv6 Solution document:  8 in favour, 1 against.
> 
> Arguments raised by those voting against the adoption of one of the
> individual documents above related to potential security 
> vulnerabilities
> or potential issues with mobile hosts.  Both arguments would 
> need to be
> addressed as the working group deliverables are being advanced.
> 
> Please express on this mailing list whether or not you agree with
the
> above documents being adopted by the SAVI working group as starting
> points for the various working group deliverables.  Please also
state
> the reasons in case you are against one of the documents 
> being adopted.
> 
> - Christian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> savi mailing list
> savi at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi
> 



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.