Re: [savi] Working Group Adoption of Individual SAVI Documents

[MARCELO BAGNULO BRAUN <marcelo at it.uc3m.es>]

Correction, only one of these draft is expired, 
draft-mcpherson-savi-threat-scope, (BTW you can easily find in 
tools.ietf.org besides many other sites, such as waterspings and so on)

Regards, marcelo


David Harrington <ietfdbh at comcast.net> dijo:

> Hi,
>
> It appears some of these drafts have expired.
> Can the drafts be re-published so people can look at them before
> making a decision?
> I suggest you extend the review period accordingly.
>
> David Harrington
> dbharrington at comcast.net
> ietfdbh at comcast.net
> dharrington at huawei.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: savi-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:savi-bounces at ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Christian Vogt
> > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:15 AM
> > To: SAVI Mailing List
> > Subject: [savi] Working Group Adoption of Individual SAVI Documents
> >
> > Dear all -
> >
> > At the previous SAVI meeting in Minneapolis, we did a vote regarding
> > which individual documents to use as starting points for the SAVI
> > working group deliverables.  I would now like to confirm this
> decision
> > from Minneapolis here on the mailing list.
> >
> > The result of the vote in Minneapolis was thus:
> >
> > - To adopt draft-mcpherson-savi-threat-scope as a starting
> > point for the
> >    Threats Analysis (Problem Statement) document:  7 in favour, 0
> >    against.
> >
> > - To adopt draft-vogt-savi-rationale as a starting point for the
> >    Rationale document:  7 in favour, 0 against.
> >
> > - To adopt draft-bagnulo-savi-fcfs as a starting point for
> > both the IPv4
> >    and IPv6 Solution documents:  11 in favour, 2 against.
> >
> > - To adopt draft-bagnulo-savi-send as a starting point for the
> >    SeND-based IPv6 Solution document:  8 in favour, 1 against.
> >
> > Arguments raised by those voting against the adoption of one of the
> > individual documents above related to potential security
> > vulnerabilities
> > or potential issues with mobile hosts.  Both arguments would
> > need to be
> > addressed as the working group deliverables are being advanced.
> >
> > Please express on this mailing list whether or not you agree with
> the
> > above documents being adopted by the SAVI working group as starting
> > points for the various working group deliverables.  Please also
> state
> > the reasons in case you are against one of the documents
> > being adopted.
> >
> > - Christian
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > savi mailing list
> > savi at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi
>
> _______________________________________________
> savi mailing list
> savi at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi



--
----
MARCELO BAGNULO BRAUN
WebCartero
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid