Re: [savi] Working Group Adoption of Individual SAVI Documents

["David Harrington" <ietfdbh at comcast.net>]

I also did not find draft-vogt-savi-rationale in the ID repository.

dbh 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: savi-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:savi-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of MARCELO BAGNULO BRAUN
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 8:01 PM
> To: savi at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [savi] Working Group Adoption of Individual SAVI 
> Documents
> 
> Correction, only one of these draft is expired, 
> draft-mcpherson-savi-threat-scope, (BTW you can easily find in 
> tools.ietf.org besides many other sites, such as waterspings 
> and so on)
> 
> Regards, marcelo
> 
> 
> David Harrington <ietfdbh at comcast.net> dijo:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > It appears some of these drafts have expired.
> > Can the drafts be re-published so people can look at them before
> > making a decision?
> > I suggest you extend the review period accordingly.
> >
> > David Harrington
> > dbharrington at comcast.net
> > ietfdbh at comcast.net
> > dharrington at huawei.com
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: savi-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:savi-bounces at ietf.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Christian Vogt
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:15 AM
> >> To: SAVI Mailing List
> >> Subject: [savi] Working Group Adoption of Individual SAVI
Documents
> >>
> >> Dear all -
> >>
> >> At the previous SAVI meeting in Minneapolis, we did a vote 
> regarding
> >> which individual documents to use as starting points for the SAVI
> >> working group deliverables.  I would now like to confirm this
> > decision
> >> from Minneapolis here on the mailing list.
> >>
> >> The result of the vote in Minneapolis was thus:
> >>
> >> - To adopt draft-mcpherson-savi-threat-scope as a starting
> >> point for the
> >>    Threats Analysis (Problem Statement) document:  7 in favour, 0
> >>    against.
> >>
> >> - To adopt draft-vogt-savi-rationale as a starting point for the
> >>    Rationale document:  7 in favour, 0 against.
> >>
> >> - To adopt draft-bagnulo-savi-fcfs as a starting point for
> >> both the IPv4
> >>    and IPv6 Solution documents:  11 in favour, 2 against.
> >>
> >> - To adopt draft-bagnulo-savi-send as a starting point for the
> >>    SeND-based IPv6 Solution document:  8 in favour, 1 against.
> >>
> >> Arguments raised by those voting against the adoption of one of
the
> >> individual documents above related to potential security
> >> vulnerabilities
> >> or potential issues with mobile hosts.  Both arguments would
> >> need to be
> >> addressed as the working group deliverables are being advanced.
> >>
> >> Please express on this mailing list whether or not you agree with
> > the
> >> above documents being adopted by the SAVI working group as
starting
> >> points for the various working group deliverables.  Please also
> > state
> >> the reasons in case you are against one of the documents
> >> being adopted.
> >>
> >> - Christian
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> savi mailing list
> >> savi at ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > savi mailing list
> > savi at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ----
> MARCELO BAGNULO BRAUN
> WebCartero
> Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
> 
> _______________________________________________
> savi mailing list
> savi at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi
>