[no subject]

BR
Frank

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christian Vogt" <christian.vogt at ericsson.com>
To: "Frank Xia" <xiayangsong at huawei.com>
Cc: "SAVI Mailing List" <savi at ietf.org>; "Ana Kukec" <ana.kukec at fer.hr>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [savi] Adopting draft-bagnulo-savi-fcfs/send


> Frank -
> 
> As I assured in my earlier email, those issues that have been raised are
> valid and will certainly have to be addressed.  This includes your
> comment regarding the support for pre-configured addresses, as well as
> the question of whether binding establishment should be based on control
> or data packets, which I summarized in the email you are referring to.
> But the issues raised do not render the FCFS principle inappropriate for
> working group adoption.  On the contrary, based on the feedback from the
> working group and the discussions I had with working group participants,
> I am very positive that there is in fact strong support for the FCFS
> principle. Hence the adoption of draft-bagnulo-savi-fcfs/send.
> 
> - Christian
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 7, 2009, Frank Xia wrote:
> 
>> Hi Christian
>>
>> It seems to be a little bit rush :-).
>>
>> I don't think people have enough
>> time to read your previous email.
>>
>> For my understanding,  it is hard
>> to hard to say "STRONG" support
>> for the FCFS principle.
>> At least, I can not  find strong support
>> through this long discussions in the mailing list.
>>
>> IMHO, the decision should be based
>> rough consensus by WG.  IETF is based
>> on mailing list.
>> BR
>> Frank
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> savi mailing list
> savi at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi
>