yaoguang escribió: > I mean, SAVI bindings are soft state, hence it can and will be discarded > at some point. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > I don't quite understand your meaning of " SAVI bindings are soft state ". > What i mean by this is that the state is created by the SAVI device as the response of a data or ND packet sent by the host (but that the goal of that packet is not to explicitly create state) and that the responsability of discarding that state is completelly up to the SAVI device i.e. the host will not send a FIN packet to delete the state. In other words, the SAVI device will receive a packet from the host, and will create the SAVI binding The SAVI binding will have a given lifetime. It is likely that the lifetime is extended if the host keeps on sending packets, but if a long period passes and no packets are seen by the SAVI device referring to that address, the SAVI device will unilaterally (i.e. without asking the host) will discard the state. This is essentially needed for memory reasons I guess a reasonable lifetime for a binding would be similar to the dhcp lease lifetime... so, between a day and a week, would seem reasonable to me (probably, if the SAVI device is under a DoS attack, it will need to discard the bindings earlier) So, it is perfectly possible that a host is the rightful owner of an address and that the SAVI device has discarded the binding regards, marcelo > When and why will SAVI bindings be discarded, and how often? > > I think they are somewhat soft, but they are not as soft as bubbles. > > > >
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.