Re: [savi] Consensus call on separate documents for DHCP and SLAAC

[Lin Tao <lint at h3c.com>]

Dear workgroup members,

I have the same idea as below. I think it's clear to describe the source assigned
process. My answer is "YES".

I have worked in TCP/IP area for twelve years, and worked in IPv6 area for six
years. I'm very interesting about it. I like the TAO of IETF. And I have discuss
some problem in IETF'S maillist(include SAVI) for one year.

So I want to work together with the intelligent people of IETF. Could you let me
take part in the writting of this draft? Thank you very much.

Best Regards, 

LinTao


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christian Vogt" <christian.vogt at ericsson.com>
To: "SAVI Mailing List" <savi at ietf.org>
Cc: "Bill Fenner" <fenner at fenron.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 4:04 AM
Subject: [savi] Consensus call on separate documents for DHCP and SLAAC


> Dear all -
> 
> The SAVI working group has so far taken the approach to specify the
> validation of DHCP-assigned IP source addresses and SLAAC-assigned IP
> source addresses in a single document.  However, arguments have been
> made, and were discussed at the SAVI meeting in Stockholm, that a better
> approach would be to specify the two types of validation in separate
> documents, and to produce a framework document that describes the
> relationship between, and common principles of, the various IP address
> validation types.  The bottom-line of these arguments is that the
> separation would be
> 
> (a) justifiable and recommendable due to enough differences between the
>     validation of DHCP-assigned and SLAAC-assigned IP source addresses,
> 
> (b) in line with the working group's approach to also use separate
>     documents for the validation of SEND-assigned IP source addresses,
>     and IP source address validation in broadband access networks.
> 
> This is a consensus call on whether the SAVI working group should change
> its approach towards producing separate documents for the validation of
> DHCP-assigned IP source addresses and SLAAC-assigned IP source
> addresses, plus a framework document.  Please answer either "yes" or
> "no" to the following question:
> 
>   Should the SAVI working group produce separate documents for DHCP-
>   assigned IP source addresses and SLAAC-assigned IP source addresses,
>   plus a framework document that describes the relationship between,  
> and
>   common principles of, the various IP address validation types?
> 
> Please respond by Sunday, September 13, 2009.
> 
> - Christian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> savi mailing list
> savi at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi
>